A statement by a minister from Rajasthan has triggered public discussion after he claimed that milk from indigenous cows enhances children’s intelligence, while buffalo milk can cause sluggishness. The remark, made during a public interaction, quickly drew reactions from health experts, political observers, and citizens, with many questioning the scientific basis of the claim.
DON'T MISS
Rajasthan Minister’s Remark on Cow vs Buffalo Milk Sparks Debate
According to attendees, the minister emphasised the perceived nutritional and cultural importance of indigenous cow milk, describing it as beneficial for mental development and overall vitality. He contrasted it with buffalo milk, suggesting it may lead to lethargy. The comments have since circulated widely, prompting debate across social and professional circles.
Medical professionals and nutrition specialists responded by stressing that both cow and buffalo milk contain valuable nutrients such as protein, calcium, vitamins, and healthy fats. They noted that the effects of milk on health depend on factors like quantity, digestion, individual tolerance, and overall diet rather than the type alone. Experts cautioned against drawing broad conclusions without scientific evidence and advised parents to rely on balanced nutrition rather than claims lacking clinical support.
Public health commentators also pointed out that dietary needs vary from child to child
Public health commentators also pointed out that dietary needs vary from child to child, and no single food determines intelligence or energy levels. They emphasised that cognitive development is influenced by multiple factors, including genetics, education, environment, sleep, and overall nutrition.
The remarks have sparked political reactions as well, with critics urging public representatives to make health-related statements responsibly. Supporters, however, argued that traditional dietary practices often highlight indigenous products and should be discussed openly.
The episode has reignited conversation about the role of scientific evidence in public discourse, particularly when statements relate to nutrition and child development. Analysts say such debates underline the importance of accurate information, expert consultation, and responsible communication when addressing public health topics.
