The Supreme Court on Tuesday stated that it would take up YouTuber Ranveer Allahbadia’s plea seeking the release of his passport after two weeks, as per a PTI report. The court’s decision came after Solicitor General Tushar Mehta informed the bench that the investigation related to the case is expected to conclude within the same timeframe.
Allahbadia Seeks Modification of Passport Submission Condition
Senior advocate Abhinav Chandrachud, representing Allahbadia, urged the court to reconsider the condition requiring the YouTuber to deposit his passport, arguing that it directly impacted his professional engagements and livelihood. He highlighted that Allahbadia frequently needed to travel abroad for interviews and meetings, making passport possession crucial for his work.
Commitment to Decency in Content
As part of his plea, Allahbadia also submitted an undertaking to the Supreme Court, assuring that he would maintain decency in his online content. The submission came amid ongoing scrutiny over his role in the controversial "India’s Got Latent" case, where he was accused of promoting obscene content.
The Supreme Court will now review the matter in two weeks, considering both the investigation status and the impact of passport restrictions on Allahbadia’s career.
Impact on Digital Content Creation and Public Reaction
The case has sparked debates over the balance between content regulation and creative freedom. Supporters of Allahbadia argue that restricting a creator’s movement affects not only his career but also the broader digital content industry. However, critics insist that influencers must be held accountable for their public reach and the nature of their content.
Court's Decision to Set a Precedent?
Legal experts believe that the Supreme Court's ruling on Allahbadia’s passport could set a precedent for future cases involving digital influencers and legal scrutiny. With the increasing reach of social media personalities, regulatory actions and legal frameworks surrounding content creation remain a developing area of law. The court is set to review the matter in two weeks, keeping both the investigation’s progress and the professional impact on Allahbadia in consideration.