Senior Congress leader and former Union Minister Salman Khurshid has voiced concern over domestic political divisions overshadowing India’s global messaging against terrorism. In a pointed tweet, Khurshid remarked, “When on mission against terrorism, to carry India’s message to the world, it’s distressing that people at home are calculating political allegiances. Is it so difficult to be patriotic?”
Salman Khurshid Criticises Politicisation of Anti-Terror Missions, Questions Patriotism at Home
Khurshid’s statement comes at a time when India is actively engaging with the international community on issues of national security and cross-border terrorism. His remarks appear to criticise those who, according to him, prioritise political calculations over national interest during crucial diplomatic efforts.
While he did not name any political party or group, the tweet suggests growing frustration within sections of the political class over the perceived lack of unified national support during sensitive global missions.
Tweet Has Sparked Mixed Reactions
The tweet has sparked mixed reactions, with some social media users echoing his sentiment, while others accuse him of politicising patriotism himself. However, Khurshid’s message remains clear — when it comes to India’s fight against terrorism, national unity should come before political rivalry.
However, several analysts argue that Khurshid's intervention points to a deeper challenge in India’s current political climate — a growing difficulty in building cross-party consensus even on matters of national interest. Former diplomats and security experts have also weighed in, saying that a cohesive message from all political quarters strengthens India’s stance in the global fight against terror.
As India prepares for major international summits and diplomatic engagements, the call for unity on global platforms becomes increasingly important. Khurshid’s tweet, though brief, adds to a larger conversation about patriotism, political responsibility, and the role of the Opposition in foreign policy matters.