Involved in the Air India urination incident On Wednesday, Shankar Mishra testified before Delhi’s Patiala House Court that his conduct of “unzipping” was not motivated by any desire for sex.
Accused Shankar Mishra claims in court that his action of unzipping was not motivated by sexual desire
Even though I wasn’t drinking for sex, I couldn’t help myself. According to the complainant’s case, the complainant is not a lustful man, Shankar’s attorney argued in court.
The court has postponed making a decision about Mishra’s request for bail.
According to Shankar Mishra’s attorney, the trial will take some time and the individual has been fired as a result of these charges.
Also Read: Air India pilot and crew members grounded over defecation issue
Shankar Mishra’s lawyer states that he is not flight risk
He is not in danger of fleeing, the attorney continued.
According to Mishra’s attorney, Manu Sharma, “My client has clearly and voluntarily cooperated in any investigations relating to the alleged occurrence, with the goal to show his innocence, and will continue to behave in this bona fide manner and assist the authorities in the inquiry.”
The attorney further argued that just one non-bailable offence was listed in the FIR while the others were.
Delhi police opposed the bail request, arguing that Mishra could sway the complainant if released on bail.
The Public Prosecutor, who was defending Delhi Police, stated that the complainant’s statement under 164 had already been recorded along with a number of other testimonies, and that other statements will be recorded in the near future.
Also Read: Air India Gets Notice From Regulator Over 2 Unruly Passengers