What Changes After Waqf Act Comes Into Force? Road Ahead for Disgruntled Parties

The Waqf Act has officially come into force, just days after it was passed by Parliament and received the President’s assent. The new legislation is being viewed as a crucial move to streamline the management of Waqf properties across the country.

Under the updated Act, State Waqf Boards have been granted broader powers to monitor, reclaim, and protect Waqf assets. Key provisions include compulsory digitization of all Waqf properties, stricter penalties for encroachments, and the creation of dedicated tribunals to handle related disputes more efficiently.

Key Changes Introduced by the Act:

Strengthened Oversight: Enhanced powers for State Waqf Boards to take action against mismanagement.

Digitization Mandate: Compulsory digitization of Waqf properties for better tracking and public access.

Grievance Redressal Mechanism: Introduction of dedicated tribunals for faster resolution of property-related disputes.

However, the passage of the Act has not been without resistance. Several community groups and opposition parties have expressed concern over the potential misuse of power by Waqf Boards and lack of public consultation during the drafting process. Critics argue that certain clauses could lead to increased centralization and affect the autonomy of local stakeholders.

Despite these concerns, the government maintains that the Act is designed to enhance transparency, prevent illegal occupation, and ensure that Waqf properties serve the welfare purposes they are meant for.

Road Ahead for Disgruntled Parties

With legal challenges likely to emerge, the coming months will test the Act’s on-ground impact. Disgruntled parties are expected to explore judicial recourse, demanding safeguards against arbitrary action and more inclusive implementation. The real test lies in balancing community interests with institutional accountability as the Act rolls out nationwide. 

While the government has hailed the law as a step toward safeguarding minority heritage, several parties and community leaders have expressed discontent, citing lack of consultation and fear of bureaucratic overreach. Legal challenges are expected, especially from groups alleging that the Act infringes upon constitutional rights and property ownership.

Analysts suggest the coming months will be crucial in assessing how the law is implemented on the ground and whether it leads to more inclusive and accountable Waqf governance.