Recently, a statement made by the Chief of the Haryana State Women’s Commission has sparked controversy. Anurag Dhanda, a prominent social activist, has demanded accountability and a formal explanation regarding the comment, which he described as “rustic” and inappropriate for someone in a position of authority.
The Controversial Comment
The remark made by the Commission Chief raised eyebrows across social media and public forums. Many have expressed concern about the statement’s tone, questioning whether it reflects the professionalism expected of someone leading an institution dedicated to women’s rights and welfare.
Anurag Dhanda Demands Accountability
Dhanda emphasized that public officials, especially those in positions related to women’s welfare, must communicate responsibly. In a statement, he noted that insensitive or outdated comments can damage public trust and undermine the institution’s credibility.
He has called for:
- A public clarification from the Commission Chief
- Proper accountability measures for inappropriate remarks
- Stricter communication guidelines for officials
Public Reaction
The public and activists have largely supported Dhanda’s call for accountability. Many are pointing out that officials in women-centric organisations have a duty to uphold respect, sensitivity, and professionalism in all statements and actions.
Why Responsible Communication Matters?
This incident highlights the importance of professionalism in public offices, particularly for authorities tasked with protecting and advocating for women. Words from such officials can have far-reaching consequences, influencing public perception and confidence in the institution
