Bhagwant Mann: Bhagwant Mann, the chief minister of Punjab, has asked Prime Minister Narendra Modi to rename Adampur Airport after Sant Guru Ravidas. This has started a new discussion about symbolic recognition, social justice, and representation for everyone. The call comes before the Prime Minister’s planned trip to Punjab in February, which gives the demand new political and cultural weight.
Demand Based on Cultural and Social History
Mann talked about Guru Ravidas as a great spiritual reformer whose lessons about equality, dignity, and social harmony still inspire millions of people, especially those from disadvantaged groups. He said that naming a big public building after the saint would be a fitting way to honour his lasting legacy.
The government of Punjab says that Guru Ravidas’ ideas are very similar to the constitutional values of justice and brotherhood, which means that the plan is more than just a show of support.
Linked to PM Modi’s visit to Punjab
The desire has grown stronger as time goes on before Prime Minister Modi’s planned visit in February. Political experts think that the timing is smart because it could help the Centre meet a long-standing culture goal while also addressing regional feelings in Punjab.
There has been no official answer from the Prime Minister’s Office to the plan so far.
Reactions to politics and public speech
People have had different emotions about the call. Some people think it’s long overdue recognition of what Guru Ravidas did for India’s social reform movement. But critics say that religious figures shouldn’t be politicised and that changing infrastructure should be done based on what most people agree on.
A lot of people have talked about the problem on social media, and many support the move as a step toward more diversity in public places.
Why Renaming an Airport Is Important
People often see naming airports after famous people as a way to show respect for culture and express one’s identity. Supporters say that these kinds of actions help bring historically underrepresented voices to the forefront, while opponents stress the importance of administrative continuity and non-political naming practices.
