Ruling on the case of 25-year-old Aakriti Chaudhary, a Delhi University graduate and activist, along with 65-year-old journalist-activist Satyam Verma, the Allahabad High Court quashed their detention under the stringent National Security Act. Both had been detained in connection with the April workers’ protest in Noida, with police alleging Chaudhary had instigated violence during the demonstrations.
DON'T MISS
“Worthy Of Derision,” Says The Bench
A bench of Justices Atul Sreedharan and Achal Sachdev did not hold back in its assessment of DM Medha Roopam’s conduct, calling it “worthy of derision” and holding her “guilty of violating her oath of allegiance.” The court said this made it a fit case for imposing compensation on the petitioner, to be recovered from the officers responsible rather than the state exchequer.
Warning Against Bureaucratic Excess
The court held that where a police report contains only allegations without credible supporting material, a District Magistrate is expected to examine the record “threadbare” before invoking a law as stringent as the NSA. It noted that Chaudhary was a student activist with no prior criminal record and that nothing on record showed she had incited violence. The bench warned starkly that unchecked bureaucratic overreach could soon turn Uttar Pradesh into an “Orwellian Dystopia.”
Discrepancies In Arrest Timeline
The judges also flagged serious inconsistencies in the police’s account of Chaudhary’s arrest. Evidence suggested she was actually taken into custody at the Botanical Garden metro station on April 11, not April 12 as the police later claimed in court. This contradiction added to the court’s concerns about due process being sidestepped in the case.
The bench firmly defended the constitutional right to peaceful assembly, observing that preventing people from gathering in public spaces over an assumed breach of peace would amount to “throwing the baby out with the bath water.”


