Viral Video: 'Ye Haram, Wo Haram,' Muslim Man Takes on Mullas and Maulvis; Netizen Says Ab Inke Peeche Kattar…'

Viral Video: In a recent viral video, a Muslim man has boldly challenged certain conservative views within the Muslim community, particularly about what is considered "haram" (forbidden) and "halal" (permissible). The video has resonated deeply with viewers, sparking lively online discussions. Using examples like mobile phones, TVs, and YouTube channels, the man questions why certain things were previously deemed haram but are now widely accepted.

Muslim Man Exposes Contradictions on Haram and Halal

In the viral video, uploaded by the X account "Khurchench," the Muslim man passionately outlines the inconsistencies in the classification of certain items. He recalls, “In 1930, they said photos were haram. In the 1950s and 60s, they declared TV was haram. Then they said pagers were haram, and later, mobile phones were haram. Now, in 2024, those same religious leaders are saying, ‘Please subscribe to our YouTube channel!’” By citing these examples, he highlights how time and societal acceptance seem to influence what is considered haram.

The man questions the lack of consistency in these declarations, pointing out that if something is truly haram, it should remain that way. “How did it turn into halal?” he asks, inviting viewers to think critically about the foundations of these rules. His words convey frustration, especially with the prolonged periods it took for these previously forbidden items to be accepted.

Netizens React to Viral Video’s Message on 'Haram' and 'Halal' Contradictions

The man’s candid remarks have resonated widely. Netizens are praising his courage for addressing what they view as outdated declarations by some religious leaders. Many feel these labels may be influenced more by changing times than religious doctrines. In the comment section, users voiced their reactions, with one user writing, “Maulana sahib ki baat mein dum toh hai.” Another remarked, “Kattar adharmi ab inke peeche pad jayenge.” This sentiment reflects the fear that religious conservatives might target the man for his remarks.