A major political debate has erupted across India over the government’s directive to pre-install the Sanchar Saathi app on mobile phones. The move has raised concerns regarding personal privacy and freedom, prompting criticism from opposition parties. Amid this controversy, Anurag Dhanda, a senior leader of the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP), has appealed for the immediate withdrawal of the notification, supporting AAP chief Arvind Kejriwal’s stance on the issue.
Anurag Dhanda Supports Withdrawal of Notification
Arvind Kejriwal had previously criticized the government’s directive, stating that requiring all mobile manufacturers to pre-install the Sanchar Saathi app on new and existing phones violates personal freedom and privacy. He emphasized that the notification does not mention obtaining user consent or providing an option to uninstall the app, calling it an authoritarian action.
Anurag Dhanda has endorsed Kejriwal’s demand, urging the government to withdraw the notification immediately. By doing so, Dhanda highlighted the need to safeguard citizens’ rights and respect public concerns regarding digital privacy.
Controversy Surrounding Sanchar Saathi App
The directive has sparked nationwide debate, with opposition parties claiming the app could compromise citizens’ privacy by granting the government access to personal data without consent. Many political leaders have described the move as overreaching and undemocratic.
Union Minister Jyotiraditya Scindia has clarified that users would have the option to delete the app from their devices. However, critics argue that pre-installation itself violates individual rights, and the issue continues to dominate political discussions.
Political Implications
The Sanchar Saathi app controversy has become a significant point of contention in Indian politics:
- Opposition parties are jointly challenging the government’s decision.
- The AAP is highlighting the threat to privacy and individual freedom.
- Citizens and political commentators are closely observing the government’s next steps.
The debate reflects the growing sensitivity around digital privacy and government intervention in personal technology.
